(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo Peter Kourzanov (22 Dec 2010 20:35 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo Thomas Bushnell, BSG (22 Dec 2010 21:01 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Thomas Bushnell, BSG (22 Dec 2010 21:55 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Thomas Bushnell, BSG (23 Dec 2010 19:47 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Thomas Bushnell, BSG (24 Dec 2010 00:53 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv? Peter Kourzanov (22 Dec 2010 20:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv? Thomas Bushnell, BSG (22 Dec 2010 21:02 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv? Eli Barzilay (22 Dec 2010 23:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo Peter Kourzanov 22 Dec 2010 20:34 UTC

Bigloo is, nevertheless an important implementation of a very
Scheme-like (mostly R5RS compliant) language that has an
interpreter, bytecode compiler, C/native, JVM, .NET and Javascript
compilers with FFI support and portable library system.

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 11:15 -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Bigloo isn't even trying to be an implementation of Scheme.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports