|
[Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alan Watson
(12 Apr 2012 02:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
John Cowan
(12 Apr 2012 04:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Peter Bex
(12 Apr 2012 07:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Queiroz (12 Apr 2012 07:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alaric Snell-Pym
(12 Apr 2012 09:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
(12 Apr 2012 11:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alan Watson
(12 Apr 2012 13:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
(12 Apr 2012 13:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Jeronimo Pellegrini
(12 Apr 2012 13:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alan Watson
(12 Apr 2012 16:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Marc Feeley
(12 Apr 2012 13:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
(15 Apr 2012 14:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
John Cowan
(12 Apr 2012 13:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
(14 Apr 2012 01:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
John Cowan
(14 Apr 2012 02:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
(14 Apr 2012 03:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
John Cowan
(14 Apr 2012 03:08 UTC)
|
Hallo, On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > I think this #true and #false is a completely gratuitous change, and if > anyone has even the slightest problem with it, it should go. It has > almost zero benefit. > I believe so as well. -- -alex http://www.artisancoder.com/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
