Thomas,

Alex included this note on ticket 70:

> for systems with no clock or concept of time,
> this could be made optional. Alternately, it could
> simply be a counter, sufficient to show relative
> ordering of events but not exact durations

So it would actually not exclude any devices.

J.

On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:16:01PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> I think this is a poor WG1 thing; it would exclude embedded devices that may
> not have access to any absolute timing information.
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@aleph0.info> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:26:29AM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote:
> > > I've added a ticket for just the current seconds:
> > >
> > >   http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/ticket/70
> > >
> > > I'll try to bring this up later in the WG1 discussion, if
> > > not you'll have to wait for WG2.  There's no reason
> > > individual WG1 Schemes can't pick and choose WG2 modules
> > > they want to use.
> >
> > Thank you very much!
> >
> > J.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Scheme-reports mailing list
> > Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
> > http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
> >

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports