Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
Vincent Manis 12 Jan 2012 01:01 UTC
The incompatibility of changing the names of inexact->exact and exact->inexact was why I suggested adding a brief Note to say that the slightly misleading names are historical. That way any perceived inconsistency between the names and the semantics of the procedures can be explained.
A second alternative is to add synonyms, using the precedent of call/cc.
-- v
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports