Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents" Alaric Snell-Pym (11 Jan 2011 14:54 UTC)
Re: Ballot item #113 "directory contents" Arthur A. Gleckler (11 Jan 2011 16:45 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents" Emmanuel Medernach (12 Jan 2011 07:47 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents" Aubrey Jaffer (13 Jan 2011 22:31 UTC)

Re: Ballot item #113 "directory contents" Arthur A. Gleckler 11 Jan 2011 16:44 UTC

> Technically you could define directory? as:

>  (define (directory? x) (file-exists? (string-append x "/.")))

We shouldn't define it in such an OS-specific way.

I do agree that we need a `directory?' procedure.