Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 equivalence predicates
Alex Queiroz 19 May 2011 19:44 UTC
Hallo,
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:19 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Andy Wingo scripsit:
>
>> There is a note about uninterned symbols here, and later in 6.3.3.
>> Assuming that the report specifies the behavior of report-defined
>> features, and to the extent that it does not mention them, explicitly
>> does not specify the behavior of any implementation extension, I suggest
>> that this reference be elided. Implementation extensions can do
>> whatever implementations want them to do.
>
> Ehhh. It's a note. No change.
>
A pointless note, it seems. Andy is right, the report does not
have notes on every other possible implementation extension on Earth.
--
-alex
http://www.artisancoder.com/
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
