Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal syntax versus text
John Cowan 16 Aug 2011 21:13 UTC
Jussi Piitulainen scripsit:
> (when <expression> <body>)
> (unless <expression> <body>)
[snip]
> Either replace the <body>s in the formal syntax with <expression1>
> <expression2> ..., or vice versa.
Replaced with <test> <sequence>, the internals of a <cond clause>.
> <derived expression> is missing (guard ...) and (parameterize). Or
> perhaps these were added when the missing keywords were added to
> <expression keyword>. I'm late in the game.
Fixed.
> 5.5.1 Module syntax says <module name> is a sequence of identifiers
> and _exact integers_; formal syntax specifies <uinteger 10>. Maybe add
> to 5.5.1 the requirement that the integers be unsigned?
Fixed.
> Formal syntax for <feature requirement> derives <module name> but the
> text in 5.5.1 has (module <module name>) instead. I think the formal
> syntax should be changed to match the text.
Unfortunately, the formal syntax is what CondExpandCowan specifies,
and that's what was voted on. Ticket filed to change this.
> Also typo in 5.5.1 on import declarations: "... redefine or mutate and
> import binding ..." should have "an" in place of "and".
Fixed.
--
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Charles li reis, nostre emperesdre magnes,
Set anz totz pleinz ad ested in Espagnes.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
