[Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?
Yuichi Nishiwaki 01 Dec 2013 05:20 UTC
Hi.
Looking over the r7rs draft, I found <bytevector> is missed out from
<pattern datum> definition at 7.1.5. Transformers.
-- Yuichi Nishiwaki
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports