|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Jim Rees
(19 May 2011 18:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Emmanuel Medernach
(19 May 2011 19:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Per Bothner
(20 May 2011 07:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
John Cowan
(20 May 2011 14:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(20 May 2011 15:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
John Cowan
(20 May 2011 15:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(20 May 2011 16:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Per Bothner
(20 May 2011 16:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Aaron W. Hsu
(20 May 2011 16:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alex Shinn
(20 May 2011 16:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Jim Rees
(20 May 2011 17:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andre van Tonder
(20 May 2011 17:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
John Cowan
(20 May 2011 20:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" Alaric Snell-Pym (23 May 2011 10:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
John Cowan
(23 May 2011 15:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Aaron W. Hsu
(23 May 2011 22:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 May 2011 10:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(19 May 2011 21:42 UTC)
|
On 05/20/11 17:35, Aaron W. Hsu wrote: > However, the votes came in and R5RS' semantics won out. I'm now wondering who actually voted FOR this (but not wondering so hard as to go digging through everyone's ballots to find out :-) > Aaron W. Hsu ABS -- Alaric Snell-Pym http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
