Bear scripsit:

> If someone presented a modified document which still claimed to
> be the standard for Scheme while actually saying different things
> about the semantics of the language described, that would clearly
> be a violation of the license under which the original is offered,
> because the original is intended for the use of the Scheme community
> and such a document would actively undermine the Scheme community.

I don't agree.  Since "the entire Scheme community" is not a body
corporate, what is meant is that the document is for the use of the
members of the community.  After all, in the view of some, R7RS-small
does exactly what you describe.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
Do what you will / this Life's a Fiction
And is made up of / Contradiction.  --William Blake

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports