|
[Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(19 May 2011 15:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alaric Snell-Pym
(19 May 2011 16:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(19 May 2011 17:11 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alex Shinn
(21 May 2011 05:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(21 May 2011 08:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Jim Rees
(21 May 2011 13:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(21 May 2011 15:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
John Cowan
(21 May 2011 18:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" Andy Wingo (22 May 2011 13:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andre van Tonder
(21 May 2011 15:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alex Shinn
(21 May 2011 18:19 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 May 2011 11:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
John Cowan
(23 May 2011 15:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 May 2011 11:20 UTC)
|
On Sat 21 May 2011 20:24, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> writes: > Chicken ... CPS-converts everything, so that procedures and > continuations are the same thing, and returning multiple values to a > continuation is just calling a procedure with multiple arguments, IMO > a very elegant approach. Interesting; thanks for the note. Elegant indeed. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
