|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Ray Dillinger
(24 Jan 2012 16:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(24 Jan 2012 19:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Per Bothner
(24 Jan 2012 19:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(24 Jan 2012 20:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Per Bothner
(24 Jan 2012 20:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(24 Jan 2012 21:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alex Shinn
(25 Jan 2012 00:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Per Bothner
(25 Jan 2012 01:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alex Shinn
(25 Jan 2012 02:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(25 Jan 2012 02:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alex Shinn
(25 Jan 2012 02:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(25 Jan 2012 02:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings Alex Shinn (25 Jan 2012 03:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Per Bothner
(25 Jan 2012 03:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alex Shinn
(25 Jan 2012 12:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Per Bothner
(25 Jan 2012 19:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alex Shinn
(25 Jan 2012 23:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(25 Jan 2012 21:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Ray Dillinger
(25 Jan 2012 18:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(25 Jan 2012 01:38 UTC)
|
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:43 AM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > Alex Shinn scripsit: > >> It has insertion, replacement and deletion operations. >> These return new objects, but that doesn't have to be >> any less efficient than an explicitly mutable API. > > I already made that point: immutable string APIs are sufficient. But if > you *want* a truly imperative, not functional, string API, then a buffer > gap is your friend. And my point is that you can have a mutable API without exposing the implementation - especially a bad choice of implementation. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
