Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
Jussi Piitulainen 29 Apr 2014 13:53 UTC
John Cowan writes:
> [big snip] there are 49 Schemes I've investigated on this point: 17
> Schemes have both exact and inexact complex numbers, 8 have inexact
> complex numbers only, 1 has exact complex numbers only, 23 have no
> complex numbers. I've counted plain Chicken and Chicken+numbers
> separately for this purpose.
I doubted the usefulness of exact complex numbers - wouldn't they be
manipulated in ways that produce inexact results anyway - but then I
realized/found out that they exist in number theory as "Gaussian
integers" and "Gaussian rationals" and are of some interest as such.
So, if I may, I vote 1) yes 2) yes for requiring exact rational
arithmetic, and 3) yes 4) yes for requiring complex numbers, both
exact and inexact.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports