That is under the purview of the steering committee.  I'll try to
remember to bring it up at the next meeting.

Thanks,
Chris

On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 08:07:54 +0900 Alex Shinn <alexshinn@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Thanks for the comments, Chris.
>>
>> We've released the final draft, so editorial changes will
>> have to go in as errata, or left to R8RS.  I've responded
>> to the more substantial points inline.
>
> Some standards bodies issue corrected versions of standards documents
> with names like "Technical Corrigendum". Typically the rule is that
> the changes can only be fixes of typos or grammar and the like, with
> no normative changes in the intended semantics. For example, the last
> ISO C standard (C99) is (I believe) currently on technical corrigendum
> 2.
>
> Perry
> --
> Perry E. Metzger                perry@piermont.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scheme-reports mailing list
> Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
> http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports