Re: [Scheme-reports] initial results of implementor intentions poll
John Cowan 23 Oct 2011 06:34 UTC
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> The following were less committal, but open, and their
> implementations are flexible enough to implement R7RS in
> third-party code:
I should think that the R6RS-only implementations would be able to
implement most of R7RS-small using a common library, with just a
little bit of code to accept define-library as equivalent to module.
Writing such a common library would be a Worthy Thing.
--
Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit. (3x)
Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!
--Joyce, Ulysses, "Oxen of the Sun" cowan@ccil.org
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports