Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures

Show/hide message thread

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures John Cowan (21 May 2011 21:10 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures Eli Barzilay (21 May 2011 21:22 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures Andy Wingo (22 May 2011 13:53 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg1] Blobs vs. byte vectors (was: 6.4 control features ...) John Cowan (22 May 2011 17:43 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Blobs vs. byte vectors Andy Wingo (22 May 2011 19:11 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Blobs vs. byte vectors John Cowan (23 May 2011 06:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures John Cowan (22 May 2011 17:50 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures Andy Wingo (22 May 2011 18:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures Alaric Snell-Pym (23 May 2011 11:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures John Cowan (23 May 2011 16:06 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures Andy Wingo (23 May 2011 18:21 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures Jim Wise (23 May 2011 18:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures Jim Wise 23 May 2011 18:23 UTC

Show/hide attachments

Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> writes:

> Clearly the only way out of this loopy conundrum is to call them
> "bightvectors".

blightvectors?

--
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports