[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS John Cowan (11 Oct 2012 22:19 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS Michael Sperber (13 Oct 2012 14:41 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS John Cowan 11 Oct 2012 22:18 UTC

This is a Formal Response to Formal Comment #456:

Adoption of R6RS

This Formal Comment objected to the following passage in the Introduction:

    The resulting standard, the R6RS, was completed in August
    2007, and was organized as a core language and set of mandatory
    standard libraries. The size and goals of the R6RS, however, were
    controversial, and adoption of the new standard was not as widespread
    as had been hoped.

This has been tentatively replaced by the following:

    The resulting standard, the R6RS, was completed in August 2007,
    and was organized as a core language and set of mandatory standard
    libraries. Several new implementations of Scheme conforming to it
    were created. However, most existing R5RS implementations (even
    excluding those which are essentially unmaintained) did not adopt
    R6RS, or adopted only selected parts of it.

If you are dissatisfied with this Formal Comment, please let us know.
Thank you for participating in the R7RS process.

--
John Cowan    http://ccil.org/~cowan  cowan@ccil.org
Arise, you prisoners of Windows / Arise, you slaves of Redmond, Wash,
The day and hour soon are coming / When all the IT folks say "Gosh!"
It isn't from a clever lawsuit / That Windowsland will finally fall,
But thousands writing open source code / Like mice who nibble through a wall.
        --The Linux-nationale by Greg Baker

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports