Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
John David Stone 23 Jul 2013 15:13 UTC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Musical Notation writes:
> What sentence? You didn't include it in the reply. (Is it free to
distribute commercially?)
At this point, I've concluded that Musical Notation is trolling
us. I doubt that he or she has any actual interest in making Scheme
documents available through Wikimedia.
The lesson for future RnRS authors: Please use one of the standard
Creative Commons licenses, such as CC-BY. Then, when people raise
questions like this in the future, just point them to the "lawyer-readable"
version of the relevant license. No matter how many times they ask, send
the same link. It's a lot less frustrating.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iEYEARECAAYFAlHunYsACgkQbBGsCPR0ElQuOACgke7yGZp4wVHzJpcFfOERkxOE
d/UAn3E4Vev31eQZ9FfKK6qtZ1txPQIl
=4jp/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports