On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Jussi Piitulainen
<jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> May I point out that this last one is now a non-argument. "@" was
> already freed and can be used in symbols and identifiers.

Perhaps it is a mistake, but the "@" syntax is in the formal grammar
for complex numbers in the R7RS draft.

Or perhaps you mean you're still able to use "@" despite it being
specified for complex number construction.

-Robert Smith

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports