Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:

> *sigh* It appears that you are right here. On the other hand, I would
> argue that you can't possibly justify a symbolic semantics here because of
> this very situation: it's just incorrect.

SRFI 9 indeed speaks of identifiers throughout, never of symbols.

--
John Cowan            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan     cowan@ccil.org
Uneasy lies the head that wears the Editor's hat! --Eddie Foirbeis Climo

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports