[Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo (19 May 2011 17:05 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Aaron W. Hsu (20 May 2011 03:01 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo (20 May 2011 07:51 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Alex Queiroz (20 May 2011 09:05 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andre van Tonder (20 May 2011 14:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Alex Queiroz (20 May 2011 14:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs John Cowan (21 May 2011 22:22 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo (22 May 2011 14:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs John Cowan (22 May 2011 17:53 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Aaron W. Hsu (23 May 2011 22:35 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs John Cowan (23 May 2011 22:50 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo 20 May 2011 07:50 UTC

On Fri 20 May 2011 04:58, "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@sacrideo.us> writes:

> On Thu, 19 May 2011 13:05:25 -0400, Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> What would you call a sub-blob which shares state with another blob?
>> "subblob" is very blub, but the analogy to strings is quite strong, and
>> perhaps indeed blob-copy should be subblob.  But oh, the voiced labial
>> plosives!
>
> I am still in strong favor of changing this name to bytevector instead of
> blob.

FWIW, I am mildly in favor, though the concision of "blob-length" over
"bytevector-length" is a point in blob's favor.

Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports