[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #436: Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
John Cowan 11 Oct 2012 20:39 UTC
This is a Formal Response to Formal Comment #436:
Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
The WG voted to adopt vector-append and bytevector-append, but
bytevector-map and bytevector-for-each were postponed to the
large language, which may provide different versions for u8,
s8, u16, etc. views of the bytevector.
If you are dissatisfied with this Formal Response, please let us know.
Thank you for participating in the R7RS process.
--
There are three kinds of people in the world: John Cowan
those who can count, cowan@ccil.org
and those who can't.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports