On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Alex Shinn wrote:

> if an
> implementation provides a REPL, it provides at least
> (scheme base) by default.

What if a user wants to interactively develop programs in which some of the
bindings in (scheme base) are unbound or have different meanings from the
standard?  It does not seem as if your proposed REPL is suitable for this.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports