Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Denis Washington (03 Aug 2011 21:50 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Andre van Tonder (03 Aug 2011 21:59 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Andre van Tonder (03 Aug 2011 22:05 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Alex Shinn (04 Aug 2011 01:20 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 John Cowan (04 Aug 2011 03:46 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Alex Shinn (04 Aug 2011 03:52 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Andre van Tonder (04 Aug 2011 04:06 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 John Cowan (04 Aug 2011 21:45 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 John Cowan (05 Aug 2011 05:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 John Cowan 04 Aug 2011 03:46 UTC

Alex Shinn scripsit:

>   The initial (or "top level") Scheme environment is empty, and
>   bindings must be introduced with import.
>
> which could indeed be worded better - the implication of the
> second clause is that `import' is provided.  The initial
> environment is indeed empty of everything other than `import'.

However, the "initial environment" is *not* the environment in effect
when the REPL starts up.  That includes at least the base and optionally
whatever the implementation wishes to provide.

In fact, I do not know what "initial environment" means at all.

--
What is the sound of Perl?  Is it not the       John Cowan
sound of a [Ww]all that people have stopped     cowan@ccil.org
banging their head against?  --Larry            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports