[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #438 (also known as #437): Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures
John Cowan 24 Nov 2012 19:08 UTC
This Formal Comment was substantially adopted by a vote of the WG.
However, the suggestions to reorder the arguments of the destructive
`*-copy!` procedures and to to rename various procedures were not
considered.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan
If I have seen farther than others, it is because I am surrounded by dwarves.
--Murray Gell-Mann
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports