[scheme-reports-wg1] R7RS 7th draft available
Alex Shinn
(10 Nov 2012 06:30 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
Alan Watson
(14 Nov 2012 07:33 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
Alex Shinn
(14 Nov 2012 07:40 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alan Watson (14 Nov 2012 17:29 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
John Cowan
(14 Nov 2012 20:37 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
Alan Watson
(14 Nov 2012 21:39 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
John Cowan
(14 Nov 2012 22:19 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
Alan Watson
(28 Nov 2012 13:54 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
John Cowan
(17 Nov 2012 13:04 UTC)
|
> There are two different include and include-ci forms, > for use in library declarations and for use as general > macros. Thanks for your reply. OK, so if I understand correctly, they are primitive expressions in addition to being a library declarations. (a) In that case you probably want to add them to the <expression> definition in §7.1.3, in which the other primitive expressions appear. (b) §4.1.7 says that the contents of the file are wrapped in a "top-level begin". I've looked for a definition of "top-level" without much luck. §5.3.1 appears to define top-level definitions, but it actually just says that that are definitions "at the top level", without further elaboration. §5.7 mentions the top-level environment for the REPL. However, I can't find a definition with regards to syntax. I presume a syntactic form is in a top-level context if it is in a <command or definition> context or a <library declaration> context. You might add this definition at a suitable point. (c) §5.7 says that optional REPL allows import declarions, expressions, and definitions to be entered and evaluated. I think it would be equivalent but more concise to say that they allow a <program> to be entered. If you don't make this change, I think you need to extend the definition of "top-level" mentioned in (b) to include the REPL. (d) Also, do you want to clarify the behavior of include and include-ci in contexts that are not top-level contexts? For example, this expression: (let () (include "foo")) Does the "include" magically convert its context into a top-level context? Or rather does the standard define its behavior if and only if it appear in a top-level context? (e) §4.2.3 includes the text "<top-level>", which looks like a reference to a syntax variable, but I cannot find the definition of such a variable elsewhere. (f) §4.1.6 is missing a "the" in "enclosing the set! expression or at [the] top level". Regards, Alan _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports