Two hours ago, John Cowan wrote:
>
> So it is not invasive and breaks nothing except user code like
>
>         (define x (set! y 32))
>
> which has no portable meaning in any case (it will not work in
> Racket, e.g.).

Sure it does.

--
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports