Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Per Bothner (26 May 2013 02:34 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals Per Bothner 26 May 2013 02:33 UTC

On 05/25/2013 07:18 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> It's efficient, but it breaks the abstraction of a container with N
> objects in it and without order.

Which brings us back to my original question: Is this abstraction
sufficiently useful to justify its existence as part of the standard
library of a general-purpose programming language?

To me the answer seems clear.
--
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports