Hi,

I was wondering how implementations are thought to resolve file names in
module "include" forms: relative to the including source file or the
current working directory? Only the former would be really useful IMO,
but there is no mention of this concern in the draft. I know that file
name resolution is actually out of scope for the report, but a sentence
hinting to what is intended might be nice. (If every implementation
interprets this differently, "include" becomes useless.)

Regards,
Denis

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports