Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate William D Clinger (05 Jun 2013 15:15 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate William D Clinger (05 Jun 2013 15:16 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (05 Jun 2013 16:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan 05 Jun 2013 16:52 UTC

William D Clinger scripsit:

> With regard to the R5RS semantics, John has explained his reasoning.
> -From- John's explanation, I know he jumped to a false conclusion
> via an invalid generalization based on his incorrect guess about the
> purpose of two examples.  I will post on this at length when I have
> time this evening (and access to my archives).

I look forward to this with bait on my breath.

--
If I read "upcoming" in [the newspaper]              John Cowan
once more, I will be downcoming                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and somebody will be outgoing.                       cowan@ccil.org

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports