Andre van Tonder scripsit:

> I don't think this ticket makes any sense.  Neither x nor y should
> be required to be evaluable.  It clashes with modules.  It confuses
> levels.

It bypasses modules and levels by operating with objects rather than
names for objects.  I don't see that as necessarily a Bad Thing.

> It may cause problems for systems that invoke a compiler on the
> argument of EVAL.

That is, a compiler that accepts textual input rather than data
structures, CL:FILE-COMPILE rather than CL:COMPILE.  This is why Andy's
earlier post confused me.

In any case, due to the volume and nature of the complaints, I have
withdrawn this ticket.

--
A: "Spiro conjectures Ex-Lax."                  John Cowan
Q: "What does Pat Nixon frost her cakes with?"  cowan@ccil.org
  --"Jeopardy" for generative semanticists      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan