[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower
John Cowan 08 May 2014 22:22 UTC
Bear scripsit:
> This goes well beyond "not like the specification" - this
> is into the realm of "apparently do not comprehend the basic
> values informing the specification."
The basic value in question is to standardize what the _maior et
sanior pars_ of Scheme implementations (to say nothing of non-Scheme
implementations) actually do.
> I think that forbidding the bug fix is incomprehensible,
> and must reveal some agenda or value completely alien to
> my whole way of thinking. Therefore I don't believe that
> I am capable of meaningfully contributing to a discussion
> of these strings.
Well, stick around; other issues will be taken up here.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Yes, chili in the eye is bad, but so is your ear. However, I would
suggest you wash your hands thoroughly before going to the toilet.
--gadicath
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-wg2+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.