|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 Jan 2012 13:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Andy Wingo
(23 Jan 2012 15:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 Jan 2012 15:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Ray Dillinger
(23 Jan 2012 20:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings Andy Wingo (23 Jan 2012 20:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(23 Jan 2012 23:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Vincent Manis
(24 Jan 2012 01:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(24 Jan 2012 02:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alaric Snell-Pym
(24 Jan 2012 09:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(24 Jan 2012 15:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
xacc.ide@gmail.com
(24 Jan 2012 16:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Per Bothner
(24 Jan 2012 17:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Andy Wingo
(24 Jan 2012 17:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Aubrey Jaffer
(24 Jan 2012 02:16 UTC)
|
Oh dear, I seem to be trolling... On Mon 23 Jan 2012 21:16, Ray Dillinger <bear@sonic.net> writes: > On 01/23/2012 07:03 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: >> strings of one character *cannot* be immediates. > > That's just not true. (eq? (string #\a) (string #\a)) => ? If they were immediates, #t. If they were not immediates, #f. > You don't have to heap-allocate strings until can no longer prove that > you have only one reference to the string. Granted, but this is a very special case. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
