On Thu, 4 Aug 2011, Alex Shinn wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Andre van Tonder <andre@het.brown.edu> wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2011, Alex Shinn wrote:
>>
>>> It's the environment programs start with.
>>>
>>> The result is that any program can be cut&paste into
>>> an interactive REPL and still work, and any interactive
>>> session can be saved and used as a program, so long
>>> as it's prefixed with (import (scheme base)).
>>
>> Even if the program contains imports conflicting with prior imports or
>> bindings in the REPL (assuming as John does a non-empty REPL), or
>> redefinitions of bindings previously imported into the REPL?
>
> No, the reverse direction (interactive->batch) is not  guaranteed.

I don't know what this means.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports