[Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Alex Shinn (23 Aug 2011 02:31 UTC)
Re: practical matters - CSAN Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Aug 2011 02:59 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN John Cowan (23 Aug 2011 04:57 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Aubrey Jaffer (23 Aug 2011 21:55 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Alex Shinn (24 Aug 2011 00:09 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN John Cowan (24 Aug 2011 01:17 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Alex Shinn (24 Aug 2011 01:58 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Aubrey Jaffer (27 Aug 2011 02:58 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN John Cowan (28 Aug 2011 04:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Aubrey Jaffer (29 Aug 2011 16:19 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Aaron W. Hsu (29 Aug 2011 16:31 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Aubrey Jaffer (07 Sep 2011 00:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Aubrey Jaffer 07 Sep 2011 00:18 UTC

 | Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:31:23 -0400
 | From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@sacrideo.us>
 |
 | On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:16:40 -0400, Aubrey Jaffer <agj@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
 |
 | > This would seem like a good application for multiple-value returns:
 | > SCANF-READ would return the number of format directives matched
 | > followed by the objects read.  But LET-VALUES, LET*-VALUES, and
 | > (srfi-8) RECEIVE expect the number of bindings to match the number of
 | > return values.  They can't be used if the number of return values is
 | > not known in advance.
 |
 | This does not hold for the normal implementations of LET-VALUES or
 | LET*-VALUES. In both cases, if you do not know how many bindings you will
 | receive, you can do the following:
 |
 | (let-values ([x (values 1 2 3)])
 |    (length x))
 | ; => 3

Converting multiple values to a list is more cumbersome than just
returning a list in the first place.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports