Just to mention, there is nothing wrong with implementations providing
optimized versions of portable packages.
In many cases (99%+) R6RS packages (aka a bunch of libraries) runs without
issues on many implementations.
A portable package should still be able to run on any implementation
regardless of the optimized version.

> Part of R7RS-large is to get those standard names at least for a
> reasonable set of packages.

> Note that this will only work (for some values of "work") for packages
> with portable implementations.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports