Re: [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3 Malcolm Tredinnick (07 Aug 2011 01:35 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3 John Cowan (07 Aug 2011 01:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3 John Cowan 07 Aug 2011 01:42 UTC

Malcolm Tredinnick scripsit:

> I think that would be an improvement. It's been years since I did any work
> with R5RS, so I'm not attached to any memory of its organisation. However,
> playing around with a personal implementation for the current draft, I have
> more than once been trying to find one of the data types and had to sort of
> zero in on it because it was in 6.3 ("it's not in the table of contents, so
> it must be an 'other'. Okay, off to hunt for the right subsection").

Okay, I've pushed the change to trunk.

I'll also record here that the implementations of delay and parameterize,
along with the associated procedures, are now moved to 7.3 with the other
syntax implementations.

--
John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org  http://ccil.org/~cowan
Any sufficiently-complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad-hoc,
informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of half of Common Lisp.
        --Greenspun's Tenth Rule of Programming (rules 1-9 are unknown)

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports