Has all contributors agreed to allow unlimited modification, reproduction and redistribution of the RnRS standards?

> On Jun 25, 2014, at 23:03, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
>
> musicdenotation@gmail.com scripsit:
>
>> Not so long ago when I asked about the license issue on the R6RS
>> mailing list I was answered to that the license allows unrestricted
>> distribution and modification for any purpose. Can you add an explicit
>> "public domain" statement to the R7RS license?
>
> I'm not aware of any case law in the U.S. or elsewhere that permits a
> single contributor to a joint work to abandon the copyright in the whole
> work.  (Joint contributors are permitted to license a work unilaterally
> provided they are willing to be accountable to the other contributors
> for any lost profits, but licensure and abandonment aren't analogous.)
> If you have any citations, please produce them.
>
> --
> John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
>        Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports