[scheme-reports-wg2] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (29 Apr 2014 03:49 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Jay Freeman (29 Apr 2014 06:51 UTC)
[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer (29 Apr 2014 07:55 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Jay Freeman (29 Apr 2014 08:37 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Peter Bex (29 Apr 2014 11:45 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Peter Bex (29 Apr 2014 13:18 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Peter Bex (29 Apr 2014 14:01 UTC)
[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer (29 Apr 2014 14:11 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Peter Bex (29 Apr 2014 14:25 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Alaric Snell-Pym (29 Apr 2014 22:13 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (29 Apr 2014 22:54 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Alaric Snell-Pym (30 Apr 2014 12:59 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (30 Apr 2014 16:38 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Peter Bex (01 May 2014 08:57 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Jussi Piitulainen (29 Apr 2014 13:58 UTC)
[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer (29 Apr 2014 16:14 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Devon Schudy (29 Apr 2014 15:38 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (29 Apr 2014 17:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Devon Schudy (01 May 2014 13:02 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Alaric Snell-Pym (01 May 2014 13:11 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Takashi Kato (29 Apr 2014 20:07 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Perry E. Metzger (29 Apr 2014 22:48 UTC)
Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer (30 Apr 2014 07:44 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Perry E. Metzger 29 Apr 2014 22:44 UTC

On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:03:33 -0700 (PDT) Takashi Kato
<ktakashi@ymail.com> wrote:
> 1) Should R7RS-large require arbitrarily large (up to implementation
> restrictions like memory) exact integers?
> Definitely yes. A lot of standard protocols (RSA, Diffie-Hellman
> etc.) require big integer calculation, so I think it's better to
> support it as standard.

FYI, because of side channel attacks, real world implementations of
public key cryptographic protocols need to implement arithmetic
operations so that they take constant time and sometimes constant
energy regardless of operands, which is very much *not* what normal
high efficiency bignum libraries do.

Bignums are great for showing students how RSA works, but are not a
safe way to implement the algorithm for real use.

--
Perry E. Metzger		perry@piermont.com

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports