Re: Questions about cond-expand
John Cowan 06 Sep 2012 04:46 UTC
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> > Hmm. I note that cond-expand, import, and include are all in the
> > (scheme base) library, presumably because they are valid top-level
> > program parts, whereas export is not, presumably because it isn't.
> > Is that the Right Thing? If so, why?
>
> export would not even make sense outside a library definition context.
Granted. But cond-expand and import have to work even before
any library is imported, so what sense does it make to put them in
(scheme base)?
--
Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.