Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan (05 Sep 2012 06:43 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn (05 Sep 2012 08:14 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan (06 Sep 2012 04:29 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn (06 Sep 2012 04:34 UTC)
Re: Questions about cond-expand John Cowan (06 Sep 2012 04:46 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn (06 Sep 2012 05:06 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan (06 Sep 2012 05:42 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Aaron W. Hsu (06 Sep 2012 12:31 UTC)

Re: Questions about cond-expand John Cowan 06 Sep 2012 04:46 UTC

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> > Hmm.  I note that cond-expand, import, and include are all in the
> > (scheme base) library, presumably because they are valid top-level
> > program parts, whereas export is not, presumably because it isn't.
> > Is that the Right Thing?  If so, why?
>
> export would not even make sense outside a library definition context.

Granted.  But cond-expand and import have to work even before
any library is imported, so what sense does it make to put them in
(scheme base)?

--
                Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.