On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 02:34:43 -0400, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
wrote:

> I should think that the R6RS-only implementations would be able to
> implement most of R7RS-small using a common library, with just a
> little bit of code to accept define-library as equivalent to module.
> Writing such a common library would be a Worthy Thing.

Given the out-of-band nature of R6RS and R7RS libraries, this is not such
an easy thing. You can't just slap a macro together for DEFINE-LIBRARY.

	Aaron W. Hsu

--
Aaron W. Hsu | arcfide@sacrideo.us | http://www.sacrideo.us

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports