On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:20:47AM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
> Thanks for the info.  I've improved the "numbers" test suite (which I'd
> like to remind everone can also be used for testing other R5RS Schemes,
> and for R8RS Schemes if the tests for padding syntax are removed) to
> include these cases:
> http://bugs.call-cc.org/browser/release/4/numbers/trunk/tests/string-conversion.scm

s/R8RS/R7RS/. Let's not get ahead of things ;)
Also, the nan/inf things need to be removed for R5RS Schemes, I think.

These tests actually test for a hybrid of R5RS/R7RS syntax (which is
useful for Schemes like Chicken that will probably aim to support both).

Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
							-- Donald Knuth

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports