Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Larry D. Lee jr. (29 Oct 2010 18:12 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 John Cowan (29 Oct 2010 20:01 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Thomas Bushnell, BSG (29 Oct 2010 20:35 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Larry D. Lee jr. (29 Oct 2010 21:05 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 John Cowan (29 Oct 2010 21:06 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Thomas Bushnell, BSG (29 Oct 2010 21:47 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 John Cowan (29 Oct 2010 22:14 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Thomas Bushnell, BSG (29 Oct 2010 22:41 UTC)
Re: Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Aubrey Jaffer (29 Oct 2010 22:43 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 Thomas Bushnell, BSG (29 Oct 2010 22:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1 John Cowan 29 Oct 2010 20:00 UTC

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Larry D. Lee jr. <llee@jhsph.edu> wrote:

> John Cowan, informed me that a proposal had be submitted to drop file
> support from tiny Scheme and move it to WG2.

Because of our charter, we can't easily do that.  We can, however,
make file support optional within the WG1 language by placing it in an
optional module.

I urge the WG to do so; the question will presumably be on the
post-Halloween ballot.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports