[Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments Per Bothner (19 Dec 2011 07:29 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments Per Bothner (03 Jan 2012 16:27 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments John Cowan (03 Jan 2012 17:14 UTC)
Re: bytevector/string/vector comments Arthur A. Gleckler (03 Jan 2012 17:21 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments John Cowan (09 Jan 2012 22:25 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments Per Bothner (09 Jan 2012 22:57 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments John Cowan (10 Jan 2012 00:15 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments John Cowan 03 Jan 2012 17:14 UTC

Per Bothner scripsit:

> Is there some other place it would be better to comment on draft 5?
> Or is it just that everyone has been busy?

Basically just busy, at least as far as I'm concerned.  This is the
right place.  Also, it needs a complex response, and I haven't had
enough cycles (thanks to the holidays) to write up that response.  I'm
still thinking about it, though.

--
Dream projects long deferred             John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
usually bite the wax tadpole.            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --James Lileks

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports