[Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions? Andy Wingo (05 May 2011 15:13 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions? Aaron W. Hsu (05 May 2011 15:31 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions? John Cowan (05 May 2011 16:46 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions? xacc.ide@gmail.com (05 May 2011 15:49 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions? Aaron W. Hsu (05 May 2011 17:40 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions? Aaron W. Hsu (05 May 2011 19:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions? John Cowan 05 May 2011 16:45 UTC

Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:

> The behavior of the `map' function regarding early termination was
> discussed, and then we voted on it. I forget the justification, but I
> believe it may have had something to do with getting `map' to behave
> more like SRFI-1 `map'.

That's correct.  There are a number of changes for SRFI-1 compatibility:
the other one I recall right now is the provision of an optional third
argument to ASSOC and MEMBER rather than introducing ASSP and MEMP as
R6RS did.

--
In politics, obedience and support      John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
are the same thing.  --Hannah Arendt    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports