[Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
Marc Feeley 01 Jul 2012 00:23 UTC
Formal Comment
Submitter's name: Marc Feeley
Submitter's email: feeley at iro.umontreal.ca
Relevant draft: r7rs draft 6
Type: defect
Priority: minor
Relevant section of draft: 6.9. Bytevectors
Summary: Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
Many implementations of Scheme have adopted SRFI-4 where bytevectors
are called u8vectors, and where the procedures operating on
bytevectors have u8vector in their name.
I see no reason to introduce new names. It will require many
implementations to implement the new names, and moreover the SRFI-4
names will have to be kept for code which uses SRFI-4. This is
needless bloat.
The name u8vector is a very mnemonic way of expressing verbally the
external representation #u8(...) which is used by R7RS for
bytevectors.
I also find the names bytevector-u8-ref and bytevector-u8-set!
very clumsy and verbose compared to u8vector-ref and u8vector-set!.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports