Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
John Cowan 30 Sep 2011 04:38 UTC
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> By all means, but the ballot item was unclear and will require a
> re-vote. In the meantime, the draft we submit with the call for
> formal comments will need to revert to either R5RS (unspecified) or
> R6RS.
As I noted in my long email to Will, R5RS = different, not unspecified,
given that we define (= +nan.0 x) as false for any number x. (I just
added this to the draft.)
--
Why are well-meaning Westerners so concerned that John Cowan
the opening of a Colonel Sanders in Beijing means cowan@ccil.org
the end of Chinese culture? [...] We have had http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Chinese restaurants in America for over a century,
and it hasn't made us Chinese. On the contrary,
we obliged the Chinese to invent chop suey. --Marshall Sahlins
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports