[Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(19 May 2011 15:49 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alaric Snell-Pym
(19 May 2011 16:11 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(19 May 2011 17:11 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alex Shinn
(21 May 2011 05:04 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(21 May 2011 08:52 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Jim Rees
(21 May 2011 13:58 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(21 May 2011 15:10 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
John Cowan
(21 May 2011 18:24 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andy Wingo
(22 May 2011 13:28 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Andre van Tonder
(21 May 2011 15:19 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alex Shinn
(21 May 2011 18:19 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 May 2011 11:34 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values" John Cowan (23 May 2011 15:57 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 May 2011 11:20 UTC)
|
Alaric Snell-Pym scripsit: > Perhaps what should happen, to encourage people to Do It Right The First > Time, is to have some syntax to capture the values of an expression as > some opaque object, and another to return those values. That would be: (define-syntax values-of (syntax-rules () ((values-of x) (call-with-values (lambda () x) list)))) (define (unwrap-values v) (apply values v)) Add opacity at your pleasure. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Dievas dave dantis; Dievas duos duonos --Lithuanian proverb Deus dedit dentes; deus dabit panem --Latin version thereof Deity donated dentition; deity'll donate doughnuts --English version by Muke Tever God gave gums; God'll give granary --Version by Mat McVeagh _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports