Group Email Manager

login signup
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (20 May 2011 07:08 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (20 May 2011 16:02 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Andy Wingo (20 May 2011 16:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (20 May 2011 19:48 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (20 May 2011 19:50 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Emmanuel Medernach (21 May 2011 06:43 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Andy Wingo (21 May 2011 08:49 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (21 May 2011 17:50 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Andy Wingo (22 May 2011 14:05 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Emmanuel Medernach (24 May 2011 07:06 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (24 May 2011 16:08 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Emmanuel Medernach (24 May 2011 17:06 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Aaron W. Hsu (24 May 2011 18:54 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Per Bothner (24 May 2011 23:26 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (24 May 2011 21:20 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (24 May 2011 21:26 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (24 May 2011 21:37 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (24 May 2011 21:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Aaron W. Hsu (25 May 2011 03:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (25 May 2011 06:42 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Andy Wingo (21 May 2011 08:42 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Aaron W. Hsu (20 May 2011 16:27 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Alex Shinn (20 May 2011 16:54 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Andy Wingo (20 May 2011 16:57 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (20 May 2011 17:47 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (20 May 2011 20:38 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (21 May 2011 02:03 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (21 May 2011 05:11 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (21 May 2011 05:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (21 May 2011 18:43 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Andre van Tonder (21 May 2011 19:49 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (21 May 2011 20:49 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Aaron W. Hsu 24 May 2011 18:54 UTC 
On Tue, 24 May 2011 13:04:21 -0400, Emmanuel Medernach
<emmanuel.medernach@gmail.com> wrote:

> Indeed, but in (foo X Y) I would not allow the evaluation of expression
> X to interfere with Y : if X is (values X1 X2) and Y is (values), foo
> could mislead X1 with X and X2 with Y as in some implementation. I mean
> doesn't the report has to specify that evaluation of X has to be bound
> to X only ?

Indeed, how many implementation contain this semantics? Is it a semantics
that is justified or should we clarify the language to not permit values
passed to one continuation to "infect" another continuation? I'm of a mind
that this sort of requirement would be a good thing.

	Aaron W. Hsu

--
Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports