Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
John Cowan 05 Jul 2011 04:52 UTC
Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:
> This just illustrates why choosing a syntax that is not backwards compatible
> with R6RS, yet is a feature subset of it is a bad idea. This issue wouldn't
> exist if we took the subset of features in R6RS that we currently use and use
> the R6RS syntax.
It's not a feature subset of it, because R6RS doesn't have `include`.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan
Half the lies they tell about me are true.
--Tallulah Bankhead, American actress
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
